Monday, December 08, 2008

When is exposure not exposure?


John Barrowman got into hot water when he exposed his genitals on the BBC. Complaints poured into the Beeb when he exposed himself during an interview on Radio 1. Yes, that's right. On RADIO 1.


Is it just me, or do you have to paint graphic pictures in your own mind to get over-excited about an actor saying that he's exposing himself? I haven't heard whether or not the interviewers were offended. If they weren't I shouldn't think that John's got much to feel remorseful about.


And yet he's solemnly made a statement abasing himself and apologising profusely for this offensive behaviour. If that's all that people have got to worry about...


3 comments:

Unknown said...

Since the DJ's were the ones egging him on to do it. I highly doubt they were offended.

It just irks me that everyone is blaming him and not one mention of the DJ's who egged him to do it.

Frankie C. said...

Absolutely. What a nonsense! People do love a big fuss, don't they?

Anonymous said...

Please correct your account. The BBC received ONE complaint about this.
ONE. The fuss was started by The Daily Mail Newspaper.